Bhumjaithai Party, May 3 – Bhumjaithai registrar clarified after being twisted about the marijuana law Go ahead and ask the Election Commission Examining “Srettha-prasert”, slandering, telling lies, suggesting that the maximum penalty may be to the point of dissolution of the party, mocking “Srettha” as an actor, having no decision-making power in the party If you fail the exam, go back and sell the house.
Mr. Supachai Jaisamut, registrar of Bhumjaithai Party Statement on the case of Mr. Srettha Thavisin, Pheu Thai Party’s prime ministerial candidate, who made a disparaging speech with false statements or persuaded to mislead the popularity rating of Bhumjaithai Party candidates. on the issue of marijuana It accused the Bhumjaithai Party of allowing free marijuana and intoxicating youth. which such slander is false And confirm that the unlocking of marijuana is a vote of parliament unanimously. consisting of MPs and senators
“The vote approves the unlocking. Members of the Pheu Thai Party also voted in agreement. and the issuance of announcements by the Minister of Public Health It is the issuance of announcements in accordance with the duties prescribed by law. not indiscriminate or neglect The unlocking of marijuana has been in place since December 2021. The Pheu Thai Party has never opposed it. In addition, the Bhumjaithai Party views that Thailand should have a law to regulate marijuana for medical and economic use. therefore proposed a bill for marijuana Hemp enters the House of Representatives But the bill has yet to be approved. Because MPs from the Pheu Thai Party or other parties pulled the game to not complete the consideration of the draft law, ”said Supachai.
Mr. Supachai said that Mr. Setthaprasai It is falsely slandering or misleading the popularity of the Bhumjaithai Party candidates. which is an offense under Section 73 of the Organic Act on Election of Members of the House of Representatives, which has stipulated that no candidate or person shall act in any way To incentivize voters to vote for themselves or abstain or vote for a candidate. or persuading them to vote not to choose anyone Member of the House of Representatives by means of the following: (5) deception, coercion, coercion use threatening influence slander with falsehood or misleading in the popular vote of a candidate or political party
“The status of Mr. Srettha Thavisin as an advisor to the head of the Pheu Thai family. no legal effect But it is the function of the party’s executive committee. to have the duty to control and supervise Members are prohibited from committing acts that violate the constitution in terms of rules, announcements and orders. which Mr. Settha said that if he chose Bhumjaithai, he would get General Prayuth Chan Ocha as Prime Minister It is considered false slander. because of the truth Bhumjaithai Party has always announced that Anutin Charnvirakul has always been nominated for Prime Minister, ”said Supachai.
Mr. Supachai said that now there are party members. who have been damaged by such actions have already taken legal action, such as Mr. Supachai Phosu, appealing to the Provincial Election Commission in the case that Mr. Srettha made a speech that if Mr. Supachai and the Bhumjaithai Party were elected Will bring free marijuana to corrupt the youth of Nakhon Phanom In addition, the fact that Mr. Prasert Chanruangthong, Secretary General of the Pheu Thai Party, came out to say in a false slander. affirmed that the party would do everything possible to prevent defamation. And Mr. Srettha must be ready to receive the results of what he said. which shows a lack of maturity Confirmed that the Bhumjaithai Party would definitely not accept this matter.
Mr. Supachai said that according to Section 101 of the Political Parties Act, it stipulates that Whoever informs or accuses a political party or any person of committing an offense under the Organic Act Knowing that it is a falsehood is punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, a fine not exceeding 100,000 baht, or both. and order the court to revoke right to run for election If the offender under paragraph one is a political party including party executive committee shall be punished twice. of the specified penalty and have the committee submit the matter The Constitutional Court shall order the dissolution of that political party and revoke its rights. apply for election of party leaders and executive committee of political parties, ”said Mr. Supachai.
The said operation Will it be a pressure to form a government? Mr. Supachai said that the party has never criticized the policies of other political parties, so asked Mr. Srettha to review his actions. and called on the Pheu Thai Party to declare and confirm clearly that If you see that marijuana has a problem Will return marijuana to drugs as before Ready to leave to the Election Commission (ECT) to carry out the duties of the investigative team. without having to wait for someone to complain Both about the speech and the attack and the efforts of Mr. Chuwit Kamolwisit who disrupted the speech stage of the Bhumjaithai Party which the party has submitted for review many times for the election to be honest and fair
As for the case of Mr. Settha Tang Kamphaeng Don’t take General Prawit Wongsuwan and don’t take the Marijuana Party. If after the election not according to this Is Mr. Srettha responsible? Mr. Supachai said he did not think Mr. Srettha would have decision-making power. Mr. Srettha is just one actor.
“He came, he was shopping for the position of Prime Minister. If not, go back and sell the housing estate as usual. But looking at it, you’re still appraising. He had the opportunity to speak on stage. But in terms of politics, you have to learn. You may have competence in business administration. But in terms of politics, you need to learn more,” said Supachai.-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency