Bangkok: "Prit" has endorsed the idea of using a single ballot for both constituency and party-list Members of Parliament (MPs) across the nation to minimize voter confusion. He suggests that the Election Commission (EC) could consider including the candidate's name, party name, and logo on a single ballot, as this is permissible under the current law.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Parit Wacharasindhu, a party-list MP and spokesperson for the Prachachon Party, responded to a proposal by Ms. Siripan Noksuan Sawasdee, a political science scholar from Chulalongkorn University. The proposal involves amending the constitution and election law to require a single ballot number for constituency and party-list MPs. He emphasized the importance of having a simultaneous referendum during the general election for the convenience of the public. Mr. Parit outlined two key issues: the uniformity of information or numbers for constituency and party-list MP candidates, and the potential need to amend both the constitution and the organic law on elections. If consensus is reached among all parties, the proposal could be implemented, but the timing remains a critical factor.
Mr. Parit further explained that if the issue is approached without requiring legal amendments, the EC should use existing laws to enhance ballot clarity. For instance, if the candidate numbers remain inconsistent across constituencies, the EC could still include the candidate's name, political party name, and party logo on the ballot to reduce confusion. He expressed willingness to consider Ms. Siripan's proposal, stressing the need for consensus and a limited timeframe for implementation.
Regarding the advance referendum, Mr. Parit noted that the EC has indicated that advance voting will not be allowed, meaning voters would need to visit polling stations twice if they wish to participate in both the election and the referendum. He highlighted the possibility of mail-in voting, which is permitted under the current Referendum Act and can be considered a form of advance voting. Mr. Parit believes this approach aligns with the EC's goals and could be implemented in time if the EC decides to proceed.
Mr. Panus addressed concerns about potential legal risks for the EC, stating that while using the same party number across constituencies might be legally challenging, including candidate details on the ballot is feasible. He mentioned that discussions with the EC have revealed that logistical challenges, rather than legal ones, are the primary obstacles. With improved management and planning, he believes the ballot issue can be resolved.
The People's Party spokesperson also mentioned that the proposal for postal voting in the referendum is legally sound and feasible within the existing framework. He suggested that advance postal voting from outside the Kingdom can also be applied domestically, further facilitating voter participation.