Bangkok: In a courtroom showdown, renowned actor Film-Ratthaphum has initiated a legal battle against Mr. Patthanapol, better known as DJ Man, accusing him of defamation through advertising. The case revolves around allegations that Film demanded 14 million baht to assist with a Forex-3D share case.
According to Thai News Agency, Film's legal representative, Mr. Techasit, appeared in court to address the defamation claims stemming from DJ Man's interviews on two prominent television channels. The interviews allegedly led the public to misunderstand Film's involvement, prompting him to file the lawsuit. Mr. Techasit presented broadcast clips and public comments to the court, highlighting the confusion caused by DJ Man's statements.
Film-Ratthaphum firmly denies the allegations made by DJ Man, asserting that he never engaged in the actions attributed to him. Offering an opportunity for resolution, Film expressed willingness to forgive DJ Man if he retracts his false statements publicly. Film emphasized that he seeks truth and clarity rather than retribution, urging DJ Man to admit his misstatements.
The actor remains unfazed by the allegations, maintaining that DJ Man's claims lack consistency and credibility. Film pointed out discrepancies even within DJ Man's family statements and questioned the integrity of DJ Man's public accusations. Film highlighted that DJ Man had previously challenged the accuracy of government investigations, suggesting that such criticisms might undermine the credibility of official inquiries.
Film also addressed DJ Man's comments made during an interview with the Crime Suppression Division, where DJ Man implied that individuals like Film should not be left unchecked. Film criticized DJ Man for resorting to slander to advance his career, describing such actions as unethical. Despite the tensions, Film reiterated his openness to reconciliation, provided DJ Man acknowledges the truth.
As the legal proceedings unfold, Film remains hopeful that the truth will prevail, believing that his supporters and the informed public will recognize the baselessness of the accusations. The case continues to attract public attention, with many awaiting further developments in this high-profile legal saga.