Bangkok: "Chusak" believes that if the opposition censures the "PM" alone, there will definitely be chaotic protests.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Chusak Sirinil, Minister attached to the Prime Minister's Office, expressed concerns over the opposition's decision to submit a motion of no confidence by targeting only Prime Minister Paethongtarn. He warned that this approach could lead to chaotic protests, potentially disrupting the debate. Chusak emphasized the need to avoid unnecessary mentions of outsiders during the proceedings.
Chusak elaborated on the complexities surrounding the opposition's decision to focus solely on the Prime Minister. He highlighted the potential difficulties in managing the debate's scope, especially if it inadvertently involves the work of various ministers who are not part of the no-confidence motion. Chusak expressed his apprehension that such a narrow focus might provoke objections, particularly if the discussions extend beyond the Prime Minister's direct responsibilities.
Regarding the duration of the debate, Chusak mentioned that it should be proportionate to the number of individuals involved. He indicated that debating a single individual does not necessitate an extended timeframe.
In response to the opposition party's stance that the Prime Minister, as head of the government, is responsible for all ministries, Chusak clarified the state administration system. He explained that ministers are responsible for issuing orders, while the Prime Minister's role is limited to certain matters that require Cabinet reporting. Chusak cautioned against conflating ministerial actions with the Prime Minister's duties.
When queried about the potential for government objections to a debate linking the Prime Minister to other ministers, Chusak noted that such discussions were for the government to decide. He expressed concern over possible protests, emphasizing the importance of ensuring a smooth debate process.
Chusak also addressed the potential mention of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra during the debate, cautioning against unnecessary references to outsiders. He stressed that such mentions could lead to objections but reiterated the importance of progressing with the debate rather than allowing protests to dominate the proceedings.
Additionally, Chusak touched upon the Cabinet's recent decision to refer a matter concerning honesty and integrity to the Constitutional Court for interpretation, a decision made the previous week.