Bangkok: Wisut Chainarun, a Pheu Thai Party list MP and chief whip of the coalition government, has made it clear that the Pheu Thai Party will not obstruct the motion to revoke MOU 43-44. He revealed that the chairman decided to adjourn the meeting as the opposition had not yet reached a consensus. Wisut emphasized that he did not interfere with the chairman's responsibilities and criticized the opposition for exploiting politics for personal gains.
According to Thai News Agency, Wisut questioned the possibility of the meeting being postponed again this week. He clarified that the previous week's meeting was not delayed, and recounted his explanation given on Wednesday, August 20, 2025, regarding the vote on the Rail Transport Act draft. This draft, consisting of 165 sections, had seen hundreds of votes. He noted that MPs had already considered 54 sections of the Joint Ticket Act, and many members had not taken breaks or meals until evening. Wisut asserted that he had diligently fulfilled his legal duties, prompting him to ask the chairman to adjourn the meeting after completing his responsibilities.
On Thursday, August 21, 2025, an urgent motion is set to be submitted to consider the cancellation of MOUs 43 and 44, as proposed by the opposition party. Wisut stated that while the proposal could proceed, it required agreement from both government and opposition whips. He personally approached the opposition whip for negotiations, which did not result in any agreement. Consequently, he proposed holding a secret meeting. Discussions during negotiations also included the Creative Media Fund consideration.
Despite negotiations, no clear decision was reached for future actions, leading the chairman to conclude that there were no new issues, and the meeting was adjourned. Wisut clarified that negotiations were not abandoned and could continue if the opposition still wished to submit a motion, provided an agreement was achieved. He emphasized that the decision to adjourn was not solely the chairman's but involved other parties, and the chief whip could not make an immediate decision. If an urgent motion was required, notification was necessary.
When questioned whether the meeting closure was an attempt to block the urgent motion to cancel MOU 43-44, Wisut responded that it was unnecessary, but the matter required consideration in terms of security. He noted that discussions could have occurred in Parliament if the opposition had provided answers, leading to the Speaker adjourning the meeting.
Wisut assured that the chairman was not evading issues or afraid of discussions. He emphasized the importance of speaking well for the party's honor and warned against damaging remarks. He highlighted that Parliament is meant to resolve issues, though it may not always succeed. As a coalition member, involving ten other parties, consultation was essential. He reiterated that he had visited the opposition multiple times that day without receiving conclusions. The opposition indicated they would provide answers and expressed willingness to proceed with transparency.
Addressing allegations of interfering with the chairman's duties, Wisut clarified that he did not instruct the chairman to close the meeting. He questioned why he would be afraid and reiterated his non-interference. He explained that the chairman, seated on the throne, was unaware of discussions below, and urged the officer to inquire. Wisut expressed readiness to take responsibility if any issues arose.