KMT Child Beating Bill Request to withdraw the bill for consideration after the MP opposes the content of the law. Contrary to principles, vague, unclear. House of Representatives meeting Today (25 September) There is an important agenda to consider the Bill to amend the Civil and Commercial Code or the Bill on the Prohibition of Child Beating in Agenda 2 as considered by the Extraordinary Commission, with a total of 3 sections, but only one section has been amended to ensure that it is appropriate and determines the right of punishment of parents to speak. Teaching must not be harmful to health. Child development so that parents have a positive attitude towards their children. Do not create fear for parents and children, and let parents raise their children in the right way by stipulating that punishing children to teach or adjust behavior. It must not be an act of violence against the body, mind, or body. It is not a beating or any other act that degrades the human dignity of the child. In the discussion of the SSP, Mr. Niphon is a diligent person of the Bueng Kan MP. The Party for Thailand sees that punishing children because parents love their children. How to solve the problem while accepting child rearing and child training. If this law comes into effect, it will not be possible to train children in many different places, including teachers who will teach children, even though everyone wants to teach children well. The SSP will be scolded by the people. Meanwhile, Ms. Nan Boonthida Somchai Ubon Ratchathani, MP of the Proud Thai Party, is of the opinion that the content of the bill is still problematic, especially the clause that stipulates "which is a deterioration of the human dignity of children", which may affect the standard of public confidence in the court's decision because it is a vague word, and who will set the standard of human dignity values, and it will be a problem in further enforcement. Therefore, the Court or the MP who proposed the law himself asked the Commissioner to bring this bill b ack to be considered so that the legal text would be clearer. In order for the House of Representatives not to have to enact a law, it must be interpreted repeatedly later. For example, some words in the Isaan language are considered normal words of people in the Northeast but are harsh in the central region, or some words that are spoken by the southerners are usually spoken locally but are very harsh in the central region. Dr. Chonnan Srikaew The MP Nan of the Party for Thailand is of the opinion that from the discussion of the MP, he believes that the MP will not agree with this bill and there is also a proposal for the Commissioner to amend it, which in his opinion is in accordance with the principle that the Council accepts the principle in the first term and the content of the principle is contradictory. Withdraw and amend it as the House of Representatives or the commissioners Therefore, the Commissioner must consider whether to allow the Council to overturn or withdraw and apply the observations of t he MP in the discussion to improve the balance between children's rights and parental rights. Ambiguous words such as human dignity must have a criterion because otherwise it will cause punishment of the ruler. However, after the meeting, it was still not possible to reach an agreement. Therefore, the Chairman of the meeting had to suspend the meeting so that the commissioners could return to consider whether to withdraw the draft for review or whether to continue to confirm the amended bill. After entering the meeting, it appeared that the commissioner agreed that the draft would be withdrawn for reconsideration. No MP objected. Source: Thai News Agency
Menu