Bangkok: Teng has articulated five reasons to oppose the proposed "Entertainment Complex" focused on a casino, stating that the initiative lacks a clear goal, is not stringent, lacks measures to mitigate impacts, involves a non-transparent private sector plan, and has been rushed forward in an unclear manner. He criticized the government's approach, particularly in light of the need for caution in matters like constitutional and military reforms, warning that such actions could significantly erode public confidence in politicians.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, leader of the Prachachon Party and the opposition in the House of Representatives, spoke out against the government led by Prime Minister Paethongtarn Shinawatra. The government is reportedly rushing to propose the Integrated Entertainment Act, which emphasizes casinos, for consideration before the parliamentary session ends on April 10. The Prachachon Party objects to the draft Act for several reasons. Firstly, they argue that the government's objectives are unclear, oscillating between targeting foreign tourists and Thai gamblers, and between addressing illegal gambling and preventing Thais from gambling in casinos. Different goals necessitate different legislative and regulatory approaches.
Secondly, the opposition claims the government has not conducted a detailed feasibility study. The cited special committee report is supposedly riddled with inaccuracies and assumptions inconsistent with facts, making it an unreliable reference. Without a thorough feasibility study, the opposition believes the law is too risky and may not yield the expected benefits, potentially creating more issues in the future.
Thirdly, the proposed legislation lacks measures to prevent social impacts. The government has not yet established clear guidelines to mitigate issues such as gambling addiction, crime, money laundering, and corruption, which may be exacerbated by casino presence.
Fourthly, there is a lack of transparency in the plan to involve the private sector. The opposition accuses the government of not being clear on licensing criteria, potentially allowing undue influence from large capital groups closely aligned with the government.
Finally, the opposition criticizes the government's hurried approach, noting that this policy was not part of the campaign platform presented to the public. The communication from the government has also downplayed the central role of casinos in the entertainment complex.
Given these concerns, the opposition questions the government's urgency in proposing this draft law, especially when the country faces more pressing challenges, such as earthquake recovery and dealing with US import tariffs affecting various economic sectors.
In response to public and opposition criticisms, the government has accused detractors of creating conditions for potential governmental instability or a coup. Mr. Nattapong countered, asserting that if the government pursued policies genuinely beneficial to the populace, the public would support the government despite objections.
The opposition leader urged the government to demonstrate the same determination and courage in addressing constitutional, military, and economic reforms as it has in pushing for the casino legislation. He expressed hope that the government would recognize the risks of hastily advancing casino proposals, warning that such actions could lead to an irreversible decline in public trust in parliamentary politics and elected officials.