Bangkok: Teng Natthaphong has affirmed that the People's Party leaders have no predetermined stance on voting for the prime minister, allowing room for comprehensive discussions before arriving at a decision.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Natthaphong Ruangpanyawut, leader of the Prachachon Party, conveyed that the party is focusing on breaking the current deadlock regarding the prime ministerial vote. He mentioned that the plan is to facilitate open expression of opinions among party members. Whether a vote will be necessary depends on the outcome of the discussions, as there are still varied opinions within the party.
Mr. Natthaphong highlighted that there are several issues that need careful consideration, including potential risks, which he chose not to elaborate on. He emphasized the importance of taking into account the views of party supporters who prefer sticking to their stance without committing to any particular party.
Regarding the timeline for the vote or the possibility of a surprise no-vote, Mr. Natthaphong did not provide a definitive answer, citing the need for thorough internal discussions. However, he expressed his commitment to reaching a resolution swiftly and noted that feedback from various channels has been received.
When questioned about communication with Chaikasem Nitisiri, the Pheu Thai Party's candidate, Mr. Natthaphong clarified that there had been no contact. Concerns were raised about the lack of official communication from the Pheu Thai Party, and he stressed that the decision on the prime ministerial candidate would rely on multiple factors and opinions.
Addressing rumors about the People's Party's interest in hearing Mr. Chaikasem's vision, Mr. Natthaphong remarked that this period offers a critical opportunity for candidates to present their visions, should any media outlet host such discussions. He reiterated the intention to reach a conclusion before the prime ministerial vote.
On the speculated pre-decided choices of party leaders, Mr. Natthaphong refuted the claims of a clear decision. He stated that while party executives provide guidance, the final decision should be collectively made by the members of the House of Representatives.