Bangkok: Senators have expressed their support for Ms. Siripan Noksuan Sawasdee and Mr. Chatri Archananan as suitable candidates for the roles of Constitutional Court judges. The discussion took place during a Senate meeting chaired by General Kriangkrai Srirak, where the main agenda was the selection of new judges to replace Mr. Nakarin Mektrairat and Mr. Panya Utchachan.
According to Thai News Agency, senators such as Mr. Thewarit Maneechai and Lieutenant Commander Wuttipong Phongsuwan voiced strong endorsements for Ms. Siripan and Mr. Chatri. They highlighted their qualifications, experience, and the potential benefits they could bring to the Constitutional Court. Mr. Maneechai pointed out the historical context of Section 112, noting that if any issues existed, they would have surfaced by now. Meanwhile, Lieutenant Commander Phongsuwan emphasized the candidates' knowledge and expertise in political science and diplomacy.
Ms. Angkana Neelapaijit, another senator, discussed the importance of having judges with gender diversity and expertise in foreign affairs and human rights. She stressed that working for public benefit often invites criticism but remains crucial for the country's progress. Ms. Angkana urged the Senate to make selections based on careful consideration, free from fear of criticism or lawsuits.
Senator Ms. Ratchanee Thongthip praised Ms. Siripan for her academic neutrality and ethical conduct. She commended Ms. Siripan's role as a professor and her ability to maintain integrity while discussing constitutional matters. Ms. Ratchanee argued that Thailand needs judges who are active and engaged rather than indifferent to public interests.
Dr. Premsak Piayura, another senator, supported the nominations, noting that the candidates had undergone a thorough selection process. He emphasized the importance of integrity and the ability to work effectively as key criteria for selection. Dr. Piayura expressed confidence in the selection committee's decision and reiterated the need for judges who are not swayed by personal connections or external influences.
The discussion concluded with a secret meeting allowing members to privately express their opinions on sensitive matters related to the nominations.