Bangkok: Mr. Rangsiman Rome, a prominent MP and deputy leader of the Prachachon Party, has indicated that it remains unclear whether Gen Prawit Wongsuwan, known as 'Big Pom', will participate in the upcoming no-confidence debate against Ms. Paethongtarn Shinawatra, the Prime Minister. He urged patience as preparations are underway, emphasizing the need to wait for a final order regarding the debate lineup.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Rome discussed the strategy for the general debate aimed at voting no confidence in individual ministers under Article 151 of the Constitution. He refrained from specifying particular issues but assured that any failures in national administration, including security, corruption, and economic shortcomings, could be grounds for debate. He attributed these failings to the Prime Minister's administration.
Mr. Rome highlighted that the opposition is prepared for the debate, with Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, leader of the Prachachon Party, set to initiate proceedings. He expressed confidence in the evidence gathered, suggesting a post-debate 'sprinkle salt' strategy aimed at prosecuting the Prime Minister with the evidence presented.
When asked about Gen Prawit's potential participation, Mr. Rome did not confirm but noted respect for the party leader and the necessity of waiting for a conclusive decision regarding the debating order. The final lineup is expected shortly, with the possibility of Gen Prawit featuring prominently.
Questions also arose concerning Pol. Lt. Col. Chalerm Yubamrung's involvement from the Pheu Thai Party. Mr. Rome mentioned that the submission of names for debate participation is still pending, and any decision would require consultation with the core members of the Prachachon Party and other opposition parties due to time constraints.
Mr. Rome further commented on the recent coalition party dinner, noting increased government concern over the no-confidence debate. He remarked on the government's visible stress and various attempts to challenge the opposition's motion, including claims of procedural flaws and excessive security measures for the Prime Minister, suggesting an underlying fear and lack of readiness to address the opposition's accusations.
He concluded that the government's current actions reflect a significant fear of the no-confidence debate, revealing a lack of internal trust despite their coalition status.