Bangkok: Rome: Rome is expressing dissatisfaction with the recent Constitutional Court ruling, which has failed to clarify the number of referendums needed. He voiced his confusion over the decision that seemingly prevents the public from directly choosing the Constituent Assembly (CON), emphasizing that the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) should not be interpreted as a blank check. He urged citizens to observe the actions of the Bhumjaithai Party, expressing confidence that progress could still be made within four months.
According to Thai News Agency, Rangsiman Rome, a member of parliament for the Prachachon Party, was interviewed about the court's ruling, which suggests the necessity for three referendums. He questioned whether this would complicate constitutional amendments, as debates continue over the requirement of two or three referendums. Rome highlighted that holding multiple referendums would demand substantial taxpayer funding. The court's decision, which prohibits the direct election of the Constituent Assembly by the populace, has been described as peculiar and potentially contradicts the fundamental democratic principle that constitutions should be people-elected.
Rangsiman further expressed concern that the court's ruling might hinder the public's sense of ownership over the constitution. He indicated that the court's full reasoning, particularly regarding the number of referendums, would shed more light on this issue. Despite the ruling, he stressed that all political parties remain committed to amending the constitution.
Commenting on the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), Rangsiman remarked that he was surprised the court considered the matter relevant. He also addressed potential implications on the MOA between the Prachachon Party and the Bhumjaithai Party, clarifying that no breaches or constitutional amendments have occurred yet. He recommended a cautious approach before concluding any violations of the MOA, noting that sufficient time remains to evaluate both parties' commitment.
Rangsiman mentioned that the timeline for constitutional amendments depends on the number and nature of referendum questions, but he remains hopeful that four months will suffice. He also discussed the possibility of indirect elections for the Constituent Assembly, advocating for maximum public participation and stating that the people's involvement in drafting the constitution is paramount.
Regarding allegations of a pact between the Prachachon Party and Bhumjaithai Party to complicate constitutional amendments, Rangsiman dismissed such claims, acknowledging the inherent challenges posed by the 2014 coup's lingering influence. He emphasized the parties' shared goal of overcoming the nation's crisis, describing the past two years as a period of stagnation.
When asked about Pheu Thai's separate inquiry to the court, Rangsiman expressed understanding of their desire for security but noted that the court's response has only fueled further debate without resolution. He expressed hope for more clarity from the ruling but acknowledged the absence of it.
On Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul's potential differing interpretation of the ruling, Rangsiman refrained from speculation, preferring to await further clarity. He also mentioned the Bhumjaithai Party's decision to appoint Mr. Chaichanok Chidchob to study the ruling, indicating a need for discussion.
Lastly, when questioned about the Prachachon Party's readiness to challenge the government should Bhumjaithai distort the constitutional amendment, Rangsiman advised patience, expressing hope that all parties would honor the agreement.