Constitutional Court, The Constitutional Court unanimously ordered “Pitha – Kaoklai” to stop amending Section 112, tying it up to using rights and freedoms to subvert the government. eroding institutions
The Constitutional Court unanimously ruled that Mr. Pitha’s actions Limcharoenrat List MPs and party leaders advanced at that time. As respondent no. 1, Kao Klai Party, respondent no. 2 who proposed a draft bill to amend the Criminal Code (No. ..) B.E. … to repeal Section 112 of the Criminal Code by using it as a policy for campaigning for elections and also Continue to operate continuously It is the use of rights and freedoms to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State according to the Constitution, Section 49, paragraph one.
The Constitutional Court ordered the party to move forward and Mr. Pitha to stop expressing opinions, speaking, writing, printing, advertising, and conveying meaning by other means. To repeal Section 112 of the Criminal Code and not to amend Sect
ion 112 of the Criminal Code by means which are not legitimate legislative processes that will continue in the future. According to Section 49, paragraph two of the Constitution and the Organic Act on Procedure of the Constitutional Court, Section 74
The Constitutional Court stated the reason that How Mr. Pitha and the party have advanced Amending the Criminal Code (No. ..) B.E. … to repeal the Criminal Code, Section 112, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives. It is a behavior that shows a reduction in the importance of the monarchy by concealing it through parliamentary means. and use it as a policy in campaigning for elections along with a continuous campaign for corrections in order to gain political votes It shows the intention of keeping the institution in a position of conflict with the people. The proposed amendment to the said law and its use as a campaign policy Therefore, it shows the intent to erode, undermine, and cause the monarchy to deteriorate and deteriorate, which can lead to the
overthrow of the government. Therefore, if the two persons are allowed to continue It is not far from leading to the overthrow of the government.
The Constitutional Court therefore ordered the two respondents to stop doing so. and stop expressing opinions, speaking, writing, advertising, and communicating any other meanings In order to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code through the proper legislative process. That will continue to happen in the future according to the Constitution’s Section 49, paragraph two.
Source: Thai News Agency