Bangkok: The Pheu Thai Party has officially submitted a petition to the Constitutional Court seeking legal action against Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul and Prachachon Party leader Natthaphong Ruangpanyawut, along with 212 MPs, following their involvement in signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOA). Attorney Nat has raised concerns regarding Siripong Angkasakulkiat's legal qualifications after his claim that the MOA lacks legal binding, suggesting that the signing constitutes manipulation. The petition was received by Deputy Transport Minister Manoporn Charoensri, a Pheu Thai Party leader.
According to Thai News Agency, public lawyer Nattawut Wongniam submitted a letter to the Pheu Thai Party requesting it be presented to the Constitutional Court. The petition involves three key points: first, a request for the Constitutional Court to determine whether Anutin's Prime Ministerial status should be terminated as per the Constitution, due to alleged ethical violations. The second point seeks a ruling on the House membership of Natthaphong and 212 MPs in connection with the MOA, arguing that it contravenes the Constitution. Lastly, the petition asks the Attorney General to consider the cessation of actions perceived as attempts to overthrow the democratic regime, using the MOA as grounds for dissolving the Prachachon and Bhumjaithai parties.
In response to Siripong's assertion about the MOA's lack of legal effect, Mr. Nattawut questioned the deputy leader's legal expertise. He emphasized the binding nature of signed legal agreements under Section 114 of the Constitution, which prohibits undue influence and mandates. Additionally, he highlighted Section 185, which forbids MPs from engaging in acts for personal gain, risking termination of membership under Section 101 (7).
When asked about his confidence in pressing charges, Mr. Nattawut expressed belief that if the Pheu Thai Party and its MPs utilize Section 82 to petition the Constitutional Court, they could not only file but also seek temporary injunctions pending court decisions. He referenced a similar situation involving former Prime Minister Paethongtarn Shinawatra, underscoring that their actions are based on content and evidence, independent of personal ties, and firmly grounded in law and facts.