Bangkok: The opposition leader has expressed support for the government's decision to delay the Entertainment Venue Act, urging a comprehensive study of its impacts during the previous closure period. The prime minister explained that the delay was due to an inability to control the votes of coalition parties after initially pushing for the bill. He stated that a careful study by the government would have prevented opposition objections.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Nattapong Ruangpanyawut, leader of the Prachachon Party and opposition leader in the House of Representatives, agreed with the government's decision to postpone the draft bill on the operation of entertainment complexes to the next session. He highlighted this period as an opportunity for the government to assess the feasibility and social impacts, addressing issues like gambling addiction and money laundering, and engaging with public opinion as requested by the opposition. Additionally, he supported the House of Representatives in deliberating an urgent motion regarding U.S. tax measures against Thailand, urging clarity from the government.
The opposition leader also seeks clarity on the amnesty bill, which is proposed to be postponed alongside the entertainment complex bill. He questions whether both will be delayed or remain on the agenda.
Regarding the establishment of a complete entertainment venue, the opposition leader believes thorough research could resolve illegal gambling issues. He emphasized the need for a comprehensive study of the legal system to address social concerns, criticizing the government's previous hasty approach.
He also addressed the public's call for a referendum to gain consensus on the issue, acknowledging it as a potential solution. However, he cautioned against frequent referendums due to budget constraints, suggesting it should only follow a completed feasibility study and ample public consultation. He proposed that a referendum could coincide with the next election to conserve resources.
The opposition leader questioned whether the government's delay was due to coalition party disagreements or opposition from certain senators, suggesting these questions should be directed to the prime minister and the Pheu Thai Party. He implied that the delay might stem from an inability to manage coalition party votes.
Moving forward, if the government chooses to postpone the agenda, the opposition leader insisted on a motion proposal for postponement. The Prachachon Party's stance is for a meticulous study, with no objection to postponement if thoroughly examined during the closed session. He emphasized the need for widespread acceptance from civil society before garnering opposition support, insisting on a comprehensive public hearing first.