Bangkok: 'Kham' has expressed sympathy for 44 former MPs of the Move Forward Party who have been summoned by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to acknowledge charges related to their support for amending Section 112 of the Criminal Code. He emphasized that actions have consequences and expressed a desire to avoid exacerbating the situation, despite feeling wronged and insulted in the past.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Karom Polpornklang, a former MP of the Future Forward Party and Move Forward Party, discussed the situation in an interview. He stated that he was informed about the NACC's letters to former MPs of both the Move Forward Party and the Prachachon Party, regarding their involvement in the proposed amendment to Section 112. Mr. Karom clarified that he was not involved from the start due to restrictions on his participation in Move Forward Party activities. However, he asserted that had he been involved, he would not have supported the amendment.
Mr. Karom emphasized the importance of Section 112, which protects the monarchy from direct and indirect criticism, a crucial element for maintaining the country's stability. He acknowledged the complexity of the decision faced by the MPs, stating that while they have the legislative power to propose amendments, certain actions might not be feasible or acceptable, drawing parallels with constitutional provisions that prevent certain amendments without public consent.
He further explained that the Bhumjaithai Party, among others, believes constitutional amendments should involve public consultation or referendums, reflecting the people's role in establishing the constitution. This principle, according to Mr. Karom, is similar to the controversy surrounding the proposed amendment to Article 112, where some parties opted not to take the risk. He noted that the NACC has begun the process of inviting involved MPs to accept the charges.
Mr. Karom also mentioned his role as a witness invited by the NACC, where he provided a truthful account of his knowledge of the events. Despite his past experiences with some of the MPs, he stressed his commitment to honesty and support for old friends seeking his testimony. He concluded by advising caution in legal matters, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful decision-making before endorsing significant changes.