Former MP slaps assets of Director-General of the Groundwater Department, calls for action against “Nivatchai”

NACC "Anurak" former MP slaps assets of Director-General of the Department of Groundwater, requests NACC to take legal action against "Nivatchai" along with others, claiming the investigation did not like them. Mr. Anurak Tangpanithanon, former Mukdahan MP of the Pheu Thai Party, the Supreme Court's Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions has sentenced him to 6 years in prison in the case of collecting 5 million baht from the former Director-General of the Department of Groundwater Resources. and the case is in the process of being appealed to the general meeting of the Supreme Court. Submitting a complaint letter to the National Anti-Corruption Commission or NACC for investigation, Mr. Niwatchai Kasemmongkol, Secretary-General of the NACC, along with NACC inquiry officers. There are 10 people in total in the case of demanding 5 million baht for the crime of being an investigative officer illegally. Mr. Anurak said that from the case where the NACC accused him of accepting 5 million baht from Mr. Sakda Wichiansin, former director-general of the Department of Groundwater Resources. And currently the case is under consideration of appeal by the Supreme Court general meeting. But after Mr. Srisuwan Charanya was prosecuted in the case of slamming the assets of the Director-General of the Rice Department He went back to look at the documentary evidence that Mr. Srisuwan filed his complaint about this matter to the NACC. He found it suspicious that Mr. Srisuwan filed the complaint on August 10, 2020, and Mr. Niwatchai, an NACC official. . There was an order to receive the request and proceed in various steps. within the same day make believe If there is no preparation Or if we didn't make an appointment before There's no way that can be done. The next day, Mr. Sakdam came to give a statement immediately according to the summons letter given by Mr. Niwatchai. At that time he was the deputy secretary-general of the NACC who signed. He saw that the actions of the said investigative committee while doi ng so were Has not yet been appointed by the NACC committee in accordance with the NACC Act 2018, Section 50, first paragraph. 'I have already filed a complaint about this matter with the Criminal Corruption Court Region 1, but I have to submit it. NACC because it saw that both directors NACC officials Importantly, the NACC Secretary-General is the highest official of this organization. Able to inspect and investigate civil servants politicians every day Therefore, those who will perform their duties must be honest. Honesty is evident which Mr. Niwatchai This is the 4th time I have been sued, but the NACC has not investigated this matter at all. Even though it is more serious than corruption. Because all the officials used their duties and authority to question me. without being assigned Therefore, he wants the NACC to investigate this matter quickly and orders the NACC to order Mr. Niwatchai. Stop performing duties,' Mr. Anurak said. Mr. Anurak also said that Previously, it has been noted that this matter is the Srisuwan Movement. Because when Mr. Srisuwan came to file a complaint There will be high-ranking officials. NACC comes to take up the matter. and act quickly which government officials and politicians are not afraid of Mr. Srisuwan But they are afraid of the NACC officials, so their case is an example of how to file a complaint in one day. There was a matter for immediate action. The evidence consisted of only a few pages of documents. And his name was not listed on the said document at all. Including the next day, Mr. Sakda was immediately called to give evidence. The proceedings were rushed. Even though according to Section 50 of the NACC Act, the inquiry committee gives a total of 180 days to proceed. 'Can't make you look at it any other way. But he had never been attacked by Mr. Srisuwan's movement. There are only various evidences. that makes it possible to make observations and appealed this issue to the Supreme Court general meeting Because I don't agree with what the Supreme Court judgment sta ted that the NACC exercised its discretion in investigating,' Mr. Anurak said. Mr. Anurak also stated that on February 29th, the Ratchada Criminal Court scheduled to hear the order of the prospective accuser against Mr. Sakda. Is there any basis for perjury? -314 Source: Thai News Agency