Election Commission’s Allegations of Senator Selection Collusion Referred to DSI

Bangkok: "Phumtham" reveals that the Election Commission has proposed the issue of collusion in selecting senators to the DSI. Phumtham Vejjayachai, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, discussed the situation regarding the allegations of collusion in the selection of senators. The Election Commission (EC) has submitted this issue to the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for further examination. Phumtham emphasized that the Special Case Board will assess the situation based on facts and legal parameters, dismissing any notions of political harassment. He also mentioned being unaware of whether the senators involved are affiliated with the "Bhumjaithai" Party and expressed confidence that the case would not undermine the government's stability.

According to Thai News Agency, Phumtham outlined his role in the process, explaining that the DSI is tasked with determining whether the case should be classified as a special case. He clarified that the DSI had informed him of evidence pointing to a problem, underscoring the importance of transparency and factual accuracy in the investigation. Phumtham stressed that emotions should not influence the process, which must adhere to legal standards if the DSI is to proceed.

Phumtham recounted his surprise upon learning of the charges involving allegations of gangster-like behavior. He questioned the severity of such language but was assured by the DSI that these were long-standing legal terminologies applicable to this situation. The DSI must now present all relevant facts to the committee to determine the case's validity.

He elaborated that the decision to move forward requires a two-thirds majority vote, equating to 15 out of 22 votes from the committee members. Those absent or preoccupied are not counted in this tally. Phumtham noted that the meeting's outcome would dictate whether the investigation concludes or extends further.

Addressing concerns about potential lawsuits from senators, Phumtham reiterated his commitment to duty, stating that any legal actions should be directed towards the EC, as they initiated the submission to the DSI. He emphasized that the decision should be free from personal biases and focus solely on legal and factual considerations.

Phumtham confirmed that the matter originated from the EC's submission and not from any reserve senator. He explained the legal process, noting that once the DSI concludes its investigation, the case could be forwarded to the relevant court. The choice between the Criminal Court or the Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct would depend on the specific legal issues involved.

When addressing public perception, Phumtham acknowledged societal interest but refrained from labeling the case as a political issue. He emphasized that if the allegations were substantiated, the matter could harm the country's reputation.

Phumtham assured that the investigation would follow legal procedures without political bias. He dismissed concerns about the senators' party affiliations and reiterated the importance of adhering to facts and laws. He expressed confidence that the case would not disrupt government operations, as all actions are grounded in purity and fairness.

He urged that any political implications be viewed through the lens of common sense and conscientiousness. Phumtham concluded by emphasizing the need to focus on factual occurrences and the correct legal resolution of the case.