Bangkok: The Department of Special Investigation (DSI) is set to probe allegations of collusion between gangsters and the Senate through financial channels, with potential political ramifications. Independent academic Mr. Weerapat Pariyawong suggests that this investigation could lead to the dissolution of political parties if links are established.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Pariyawong, an independent lawyer, shared his insights following the Special Case Committee's decision, which allows the DSI to pursue the money laundering case without further approval from the committee. This decision aligns with DSI law, permitting the Director-General to handle such cases. The sensitive nature of this case prompted a careful review by the committee, ensuring legal adherence. The term 'collusion' has sparked societal confusion, particularly concerning the money laundering discussion, which lacks legal definition. The offense, however, pertains to the Organic Act on the Acquisition of Senators, Section 77, involving monetary benefits, thereby falling under money laundering principles. The investigation aims to demonstrate that the DSI is operating within legal boundaries, not interfering with the Election Commission's activities, but addressing a legislative issue. By involving the NBTC committee, the process gains legitimacy and legal backing.
Further legal insights reveal that the DSI case extends beyond Section 77, involving the Special Investigation Act, Section 21, Paragraph 2, granting DSI authority over money laundering investigations. Multiple offenses linked to a single action can categorize it as a special case, allowing the DSI to gather evidence without interfering in election management. The investigation will include evidence collection, such as cheat sheets and SMS, with cooperation from the Election Commission.
The investigation also involves examining evidence against the EC chairman, with the EC secretary-general's acknowledgment of cheat sheets at voting venues being a significant issue. The DSI's acceptance of this case as a special money laundering investigation is seen as a positive step. The EC secretary-general is urged to clarify the circumstances allowing cheat sheets into voting venues. Evidence, such as crumpled cheat sheets, is crucial for forensic examination, potentially revealing fingerprints and DNA. This evidence could uncover the origins of cheat sheets, meetings, financial transactions, and other activities linked to over 100 individuals involved. Initially, these individuals may serve as witnesses to avoid charges, considering potential political movements.
The focus on money laundering, rather than categorizing the case as secret society or banditry, reflects legal and procedural considerations. This approach circumvents debates and aligns with legal definitions under Section 77. The case's complexity stems from potential political implications, including the risk of being seen as a criminal organization. The Constitutional Court's past rulings, especially post-2006 coup, provide context. If the investigation reveals evidence of coordinated actions linked to political parties, it could prompt the Election Commission to seek a Constitutional Court ruling on attempts to seize governmental power. Such findings might even lead to the dissolution of implicated political parties. Individuals with evidence are encouraged to contribute to the case, strengthened by the DSI's commitment to thorough investigation.