Bangkok: Dr. Vayo has confirmed that the case of alleged collusion within the Senate will proceed, expressing hope that the Prime Minister will refrain from any interference.
According to Thai News Agency, Dr. Vayo provocatively challenged the Senate, suggesting an outside meeting which did not occur. He announced the suspension of photo releases related to the “Senate collusion” case, with plans for further disclosures. While acknowledging that having a cheat sheet is not inherently wrong, he pointed out that overlapping information and financial links are problematic. Dr. Vayo expressed surprise at the inaction of Prime Minister Noo and the Bhumjaithai Party but maintained hope for non-intervention.
Dr. Wayo Asawarungruang, a party-list MP and deputy leader of the Prachachon Party, addressed the government policy statement debate, which faced protests over allegations of Senate collusion, halting the debate prematurely. He expressed respect for the chairman but disagreed with the decision to cut short his speech. Dr. Vayo insisted his debate followed the framework of questioning government policy, despite interruptions by senators. He concluded the debate early to ensure the public was informed, though he regretted not completing his argument due to ongoing data collection.
Dr. Vayo shared his concerns about threats he faced in Parliament, emphasizing his vulnerability. He recounted an instance where he awaited senators in a dining room, suggesting a group meeting for safety, but was stood up. Dr. Vayo highlighted the complexity of proving Senate collusion, claiming it was more theoretical and academic in nature. He speculated on the possible involvement of senators, noting overlapping financial and phone data as potential evidence.
Dr. Vayo mentioned the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) and the Election Commission might possess further corroborating evidence, including financial and telephone trails. He credited iLaw with providing a clearer picture than the Election Commission and cited public contributions to his research. Dr. Vayo detailed the complexity of the data, including the analysis of overlapping information layers and silver line alignments, hoping to present credible evidence.
When questioned about the Bhumjaithai Party’s involvement, Dr. Vayo suggested multiple versions of a 20-number cheat sheet existed. He speculated that these sheets, possibly left in bathrooms, resulted in numerous leaks. Dr. Vayo aimed to demonstrate that the irregularities he identified carried significant scientific credibility rather than merely being probabilistic anomalies. He acknowledged that comprehensive investigation would require access to second- and third-tier information, potentially held by the DSI or other governmental figures.
Dr. Vayo reiterated the People’s Party’s commitment to investigation, even if the Prime Minister promised reform. He supported dissolving Parliament to restore power to the people through elections, believing this would lead to a government equipped to address public issues effectively. Responding to inquiries about dissolving the case, Dr. Vayo dismissed such notions, emphasizing the importance of following policies and avoiding interference. He anticipated the Prime Minister’s response to both the Senate collusion and related issues. Dr. Vayo remained skeptical about the Bhumjaithai Party’s willingness to investigate, emphasizing the necessity for non-intervention during the ongoing legal process.