Bangkok: The Opposition Whip has made a bold statement in the House of Representatives, declaring that there is no concern about leaked exam papers, and challenging the government to measure information within parliament. Emphasizing the duty of the cabinet to respond to the censure debate, the opposition insists that the public will have the opportunity to hear both sides of the argument. The Whip further advised the Prime Minister to take action against ministers with allegations if evidence is clear.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Pakornwut Udompipatsakul, a Member of Parliament for the Prachachon Party and chairman of the opposition party coordination committee, discussed preparations for the upcoming motion of no confidence, in line with Article 151 of the Constitution. He stated that the motion's content is finalized and will be submitted to the President of the House of Representatives on February 27. Mr. Pakornwut emphasized the need for a five-day debate, specifically addressing the Pheu Thai Party, recalling previous opposition experiences and the importance of maintaining legislative and executive checks and balances.
When questioned about the expectations for the government of Prime Minister Ms. Paethongtarn Shinawatra, Mr. Pakornwut clarified that it is the ministers' duty to provide answers during the debate. He highlighted the importance of allowing the opposition to present its case without interruptions, ensuring that the public hears both accusations and government clarifications.
Addressing concerns over leaked exam questions, Mr. Pakornwut expressed confidence that the truth will prevail in parliament. He stressed the importance of evaluating the credibility of information presented by both the opposition and the government, and anticipated that the leader of the opposition would make a statement on February 27.
When asked about the likelihood of a vote given the government's stability, Mr. Pakornwut suggested that it would be a matter for coalition parties to discuss. He emphasized the role of the debate in reflecting governmental inefficiencies and corruption, and expressed hope that voting decisions would be based on the opposition's content rather than political exchanges.
Mr. Pakornwut concluded by expressing hope that the confidence vote would not involve political benefits, and urged the government to consider cabinet adjustments if clear evidence of misconduct is presented.