Anutin Responds to Pheu Thai Party’s Vote Trading Allegations

Bangkok: Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, has countered allegations from the Pheu Thai Party, who accused him of trading votes for 44 MPs in the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) cases. Anutin emphasized that his party operates with its own principles and will not delay the dissolution of Parliament, adhering to the commitments made with the people. He also expressed his willingness to engage with the Upper House to advocate for laws that serve the public interest.

According to Thai News Agency, Anutin addressed inquiries regarding the necessity of a new agreement if the four-month extension period was to be prolonged. He affirmed that no extension beyond four months would occur, as the existing agreement suffices. He also dismissed concerns about a minority government's capability to advance the country, a point which the Pheu Thai Party used to justify dissolving Parliament. Anutin confidently stated, "Why can't my government continue? The People's Party has affirmed that we will support any legislation that benefits the people, public, and nation, similar to our actions as the opposition when we backed government proposals."

When questioned about potential discussions with the Senate on passing the bill, Anutin remarked that if coordination with any agency benefits the public, it is the executive branch's duty to pursue it by all possible means. He indicated that a press conference from the executive branch would follow, with hopes for a smooth process. This statement reflects an ongoing acceptance of the People's Party's proposal, which has been under consideration and has culminated in the current agreement.

Addressing the Pheu Thai Party's allegations concerning a purported deal involving 44 Prachachon Party MPs, where Bhumjaithai Party allegedly secured more votes and was entrusted with managing legal cases related to the appointment of independent organizations, Anutin responded with laughter and dismissed the comparison. He stressed that not everyone should be expected to follow the same approach, highlighting the diversity in working styles.