“Sama-art” tells “Uncle Pom” he’s in a good mood after Pheu Thai kicks him out of the coalition party

Samart" tells "Uncle Pom" he's in a good mood, smokes a pipe, not stressed after Pheu Thai kicks him out of the coalition government, asks back about the promise of a man, Palang Pracharath Party voted for "Ung Ing" to be PM, but another party abstained, pushing for her to join the government, challenges him to resign and vote again, see how many votes he gets, teases how the villagers can trust a PM who breaks his promise. Mr. Samart Jenchaijitwanich, a member of the Palang Pracharath Party, spoke about the Pheu Thai Party's resolution not to work with the Palang Pracharath Party, saying that this matter is a resolution of the MPs, but Ms. Paethongtarn Shinawatra, the Prime Minister, must come to make it clear to the Palang Pracharath Party, which the party will definitely make a resolution soon after there is clarity on this matter. Mr. Samart also said that he personally understood that the term 'manly promise' did not require signing a document, but rather a promise to each other that if they were goin g to join the government, they would vote for them first and then see who would hold which position. The Palang Pracharath Party did its best. On the day that Mr. Settha Thavisin was removed from office, a representative of the Palang Pracharath Party went to discuss at the Chan Song La house. On that day, it was stated that Mr. Chaikasem Nitisiri would be the prime minister. Later, the Pheu Thai MPs voted that Ms. Paethongtarn would be the prime minister. The people must have seen what the Pheu Thai Party's situation was like. On August 15, every political party that joined the government held a press conference to announce that they would choose someone from the Pheu Thai Party without any conditions, no matter who it was. On the day of the prime ministerial election, no party sent a candidate for prime minister to compete, and the Palang Pracharath Party voted for Ms. Paethongtarn, all 39 of them, except for one person, the leader of the Palang Pracharath Party, because he was busy organizing a banquet for the Olympic athletes. The Palang Pracharath Party had submitted the names of the original 4 ministers. If the prime minister thought that someone was not suitable, he could send the names back to be changed. The party leader worked straightforwardly, without negotiating for the position, and only stuck to the manly words that were promised. But in the end, the Pheu Thai Party came out with a resolution that they were uncomfortable working with the Palang Pracharath Party. I have heard an interview with Ms. Paethongtarn that there is still the Palang Pracharath Party in the government, but the actions of the Pheu Thai Party by inviting that party and that party, have they consulted Ms. Paethongtarn yet? As for the Pheu Thai Party, it did not accept the Palang Pracharath Party because General Prawit treated the coalition parties, did not come to vote for the prime minister, and was behind the 40 senators in removing Mr. Setthasat. Mr. Samart said that it may be understood that General Prawit is an enemy, but h e thinks that other political parties are more likely to be enemies because they have never voted for him. In Ms. Paethongtarn's round, the entire party abstained, but the Palang Pracharath Party voted for 39 people. He thinks this is unfair. As for the 40 senators, it can be seen that 21 of the names voted for Mr. Settha to be the prime minister. Does this mean that the senators cannot accept the nomination of Mr. Phichit Chuenban to be the minister? Because if he did not do anything wrong, no one would have submitted a request to remove him. As for the part that says the senators are General Prawit's people, we already know how many senators General Prawit has. If they were serious, they would all come. But out of the 40 senators who filed the petition, who are General Prawit's friends? It's not right for Mr. Settha to be removed from the position of Prime Minister and to blame General Prawit. Why not blame the person who put Mr. Phichit's name into Mr. Settha's hands? That person should be blamed more. "I think we won't take revenge, but will use the legal process. I am confident that the issue of the people who don't trust the prime minister will break his promise or not, from now on, will he be trusted or not? As for the party, many MPs will have to make a resolution and proceed. As a citizen who follows politics, I have never seen since I was little until now that people voted first and then twisted later, people voted first and then betrayed later, I have never seen it," said Mr. Samart. As for General Prawit's feelings at the moment, Mr. Samart said that he is in a good mood, smoking a pipe. Yesterday, he watched the news and was not stressed. General Prawit is a former army commander, former deputy prime minister, and former acting prime minister. He has been through a lot. But if Ms. Paethongtarn thinks that the party's MP resolution is important, for the sake of elegance, she should make a promise to resign and vote again. And see if there are competitors and how many votes are left. In this case, do other coalition parties have to be careful? As for the trend that the group of Colonel Thammanat Prompao has joined hands with the Democrat Party to topple General Prawit, I don't know. But I think that the house has house rules, the country has city rules, and political parties have rules. I think that it is a matter for the party's seniors to proceed. As for if only Colonel Thammanat's group joins the government, what effect will it have on the Palang Pracharath Party? Mr. Samart asked back, has it ever been done? Because from what Mr. Thaksin Shinawatra said, if he comes, he comes as a whole person, does that mean he comes as a whole party? We have to interpret it ourselves because the party is bigger than the people, the people are bigger than the party. Therefore, no matter what is done, there must be a party resolution. He also confirmed that the Palang Pracharath Party will not split, but all MPs can have different opinions, but in the end, there must be a party resolution. As for whether anyone w ill follow it or not, that is another matter, but we must respect each other. Mr. Samart said that if in the future they become the opposition and vote against the opposition's resolution, it is their privilege, but in the end, there are party rules. As for whether there is an opportunity to expel the group of Colonel Thammanat from the party or not, that is a matter for the party's executive committee. He believes that it is not a plan to turn off the switch of the 3 Ps because it cannot be turned off anyway. General Prawit is still an MP and a prime ministerial candidate. And what was said to turn off the switch is probably not true and cannot be turned off because he is confident that the 3 Ps still love each other. When he said that he would turn off the switch of the 3 Ps, what would be turned off? He does not believe that it can be turned off. He believes that the relationship between the 3 Ps has been around for more than 50 years and no one can break it apart. As for if we really have to work with t he opposition, I think the opposition doesn't want unity like the government, which has to gather votes. If they lose the vote, the government will collapse. The opposition party works to monitor the government. This confirms that General Prawit has not resigned from being an MP, despite previous rumors twice.- Source: Thai News Agency