'Rangsiman Rome' responded after 'Udom Sithiwirattham' came out to claim gratitude for the People's Party, dissolving it and getting 20 million baht richer, saying that no society would accept the dissolution of the party, questioning the conclusion of the Move Forward Party case, whether it was judged neutrally or based on hostility. Rangsiman Rome, a party-list MP for the Prachachon Party, mentioned the case of Udom Sithiwirattham demanding gratitude from the 'Prachachon Party'. If the Move Forward Party is not dissolved, it will not be 20 million baht rich. He said that no society will accept the dissolution of a political party in this year, especially a developed society. He thinks that when we, politicians, talk to foreign political parties that are models of democracy or are in the process of developing democracy, everyone is surprised that the dissolution of a party, especially the Move Forward Party, has happened. And it is not the first time that it has happened. No one accepts and understands it, especially the issues that lead to the dissolution of the party, whether it is the policies of the Move Forward Party or the proposal to sign a law. These are all things that should be done. Therefore, dissolving a party like this is not acceptable. And when the party is already in the right, the people who come to be party members sympathize. Many people donate money. It is an action taken by the public sector who feel that this political party is theirs and they want to push for this party to return to work in the parliament with full pride as soon as possible. Of course, if compared to the damage of the party dissolution, it is much more. But the people do what they can to support us. 'It's not a joke, it's not something that can be joked about, that the dissolution of the party gives the People's Party 20 million baht in income. The dissolution of the Move Forward Party has stripped quality politicians, who should be the future of the country, of their political rights. The dissolution of the party has m ade fellow MPs on the party list no longer have rights, forcing us to find new members, causing our members to be destroyed. The damage that has occurred is not only the damage to the Move Forward Party, but also the damage to the people who want to see politics that fight with policies, fight with ideas. The use of the law to dissolve the party should be something that has already ended. It's a pity that it's still like that. I'm quite shocked by the idea. I read it and feel that the people who ordered the dissolution of the party like this don't feel that it should be done,' said Mr. Rangsiman. When asked about the maturity of the speaker, Mr. Rangsiman said that he understood Mr. Udom, who graduated from law school and had an understanding of the law. However, normally, a person who is a judge should decide a case based on neutrality, not involving themselves in the case. If we look at it this way, it will raise questions about whether the Constitutional Court's decision is truly neutral, based on evidenc e, or based on giving the Move Forward Party a full opportunity to fight the case. Or, in the end, the decision in this case is based on the enemy of the Move Forward Party or some belief. If that is the case, I think our laws will have many problems and will further undermine the faith of our people. As for the impacts that have occurred today, what kind of damage will it cause? Mr. Rangsiman said that there will probably be questions from many citizens about what exactly is the Constitutional Court's decision. Questions like this make the legal profession very afraid because the decision is not finalized. Since the decision cannot create trust, he believes that society is now asking this question, which will lead to a lack of confidence in politics and political instability, like a country without a soul. Driving the economy and developing the country to grow will be almost impossible because no investor would want to invest. Therefore, those involved in destroying political stability should be the ones wh o are responsible for any damage that occurs. When asked about the case of students from some institutes calling for the removal of some Constitutional Court judges from their positions as special lecturers, Mr. Rangsiman viewed that the decisions of the Constitutional Court judges are related to politics, not just legal issues, unlike other courts. It must be admitted that issues of this nature or ethical issues are something that some people agree with and some people disagree with. And of course, many people think that the Move Forward Party should not be dissolved because the proposal to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code has been amended before, and there is nothing written that prohibits amendments. When the situation is like this, it raises questions. Moreover, the 9:0 decision raises questions about the transparency of the decision because when compared to other decisions, it is very difficult to find a consensus like this. There must be some people who feel that they want to do something that ca n be done, and this is reflected by the students who signed the petition to remove them. As for the case where the judge said the party should thank him, Mr. Rangsiman laughed before saying that we can't thank him because this is a matter that should be discussed seriously. Using sarcastic sentences is not based on respect for the power of the people at all. I think that this is something that all parties in society must give importance to, regardless of what organization you are or where you come from according to the constitution. But I want everyone to respect the highest power that belongs to the people. 'At least have some respect. I understand the political game. I understand the attempts to destroy the Move Forward Party from various parties. But I insist that no matter how you feel, whether you like or dislike the Move Forward Party, please respect the power of the people. Don't let the use of legal warfare become normal in society,' said Mr. Rangsit Mant. Source: Thai News Agency
Menu