Election Commission of Thailand, June 15 - "Ruangkrai" sends additional documents to the Election Commission of Thailand to support the M. 151 exam. "Pitha" confirms that he has no part in the ITV conjuring movement. Asked back from the stock market and filed with the SEC, why?
Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Palang Pracharat Party sent more evidence and asked The Election Commission or Election Commission to investigate further. In the case of setting up a committee to investigate Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat Candidate for the Prime Minister and leader of the Progressive Party That was considered in a criminal case under Section 151 of the Election Act of 2018, including requesting the Election Commission to check according to the form of MPs 4/20, which is a letter of consent for the nomination to apply as List of MPs and 4/30 Letters of consent to nominate for appointment as Prime Minister Whether it falls under the provisions of Section 132 or not, it has been sent by post. along with a copy of the Facebook page of the Progressive Party Who posted a message titled "The broken band scammer, Kao Klai Dissected, increased the ITV conjuring movement" containing the contents of the case of Mr. Chaitawat Tulathon, the secretary of the Kao Klai Party Press conference to open the audio clip of the shareholders' meeting of ITV Public Company Limited and a copy of Sor.Sor.Sor.4/20 and 4/30 forms.
Mr. Ruangkrai said that some of the messages were inaccurately referring to him. not true I would like to reiterate that the trip came to lodge a complaint. Past Election Commission he operates alone not shared with others As for Mr. Chaitawat Indicates in the case that the Election Commission will take 151 against Mr. Phitha without sufficient evidence and weight. He was of the opinion that the actions taken by the Election Commission under Section 151 should include actions according to Sor.Sor.Sor.Sor.Sor.Sor.Sor.Sor.4/20 and 4/30 forms. Therefore, it should be examined under Section 151 completely because according to the letter of consent to nominate candidates. Election on a list basis and a letter of consent for the nomination to be appointed as Prime Minister Which Mr. Phitha must already sign to support
Mr. Ruangkrai said that sending this book It was an additional transmission according to Section 151 after a few days. The Progressive Party has posted messages referring to themselves. which confirmed that it was done alone Not a sorcerer In addition to submitting additional supporting evidence Also explains the constitution, section 98 (3) must not hold media shares. This applies to other organizations as well, such as the Senate, the Cabinet, Ministers, and judges of the Constitutional Court. including directors of independent organizations and constitutional organizations Must not hold media shares As for the Kao Klai Party, trying to defend that it held only 4.2 thousand shares, he asked for section 187 of the constitution to see that if the constitution would determine the number of shares It must be stated that if the minister holds shares or being a partner in a limited partnership company exceeding 5 percent, if exceeding this amount but not notifying or depositing, he must be removed from his position But if it is a manipulation or interference with the work of the media, it will fall under Section 184, paragraph 4. The Election Commission will prosecute criminal cases under Section 151 of the Royal Decree. Regarding the election of MPs, one must look in the letter agreeing to run for the election of MPs and candidates that must not have prohibited characteristics. But because Mr. Phitha Samak 2 statuses, both MPs, list and apply for a candidate for the Prime Minister which is also forbidden He therefore asked the Election Commission to further investigate this issue.
When asked whether the Progressive Party had an argument that prohibited properties It does not cover the qualifications of the prime minister's candidate. Mr. Ruangkrai said that who said that he came to read the second paragraph of the constitution, section 89 or not? Ask people who speak to read the constitution, section 89, paragraph two, and Section 14, paragraph two of the National Security Council Act.
Questions about ITV's 2022 financial report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Business Development Ministry of Commerce have different text about doing media business and pointing out suspicious that the report of the budget That came out on May 10, the same day that Mr. Ruangkrai brought to submit a petition against Mr. Phitha, which the Election Commission of Thailand is considered as one of the ITV conspiracy movements. lodge The Election Commission of Thailand from May 9th said that it would come to submit an application to the Election Commission on May 10th, which would like to see Mr. Pita's personal Facebook page. who posted a statement clarifying about this complaint on May 9 that he intended to block the far-reaching party because the party is breaking down the capital monopoly There is nothing written that ITV has been conjured up. As for the view that the budget report submitted to the SEC and the Department of Business Development is suspicious, it can be called for an examination. But he did not look at this document from the SEC. And he suspected that when ITV was delisted from the stock market Why do you still need to submit a budget report to the SEC, which Mr. Phitha posted on Facebook on May 6 that ITV has been removed from the stock market?-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency